criminal law cases 2018 - An Overview
criminal law cases 2018 - An Overview
Blog Article
refers to a landmark case decided because of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Below’s a brief overview:
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, It's also a nicely-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is issue for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.
V) During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that fire-arm injury which was fatal on the deceased was caused by the petitioner but in support of opinion from the Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is on the market over the file and mere ipsi dixit of police is not binding around the Court.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not respond to inquiries seeking legal information or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed for the court in which the case has actually been or will be filed.
very long period petitioner wasn't deemed for promotion, meeting on the departmental promotion committee and take into account the petitioner (Promotion)
To the foregoing reasons the instant suit is dismissed with no order as to cost. Office to prepare decree in the above terms. Read more
If a sufferer is shot at point-blank variety, it might still be fair to infer that the accused intended death. However, that is not always the case.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar issue. When they sue their landlord, the court must use the previous court’s decision in making use of the legislation. This example of case legislation refers to two cases listened to within the state court, with the same level.
9. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
This case is cited in various subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional law, judicial independence, and also the rule of regulation.
The scrupulous reader may possibly have noticed one thing above: a flaw. Further than the first seven words, the definition focuses on the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The 2 standard elements that must be proven in order to convict a person of a crime are “
Regardless of its popularity, not many may well be aware of its intricacies. This article is surely an attempt to highlight the flaws of this section and also the really minimal threshold that governs it.
In case the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only accomplished In case the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence as get more info well as petitioner company responded on the allegations as such they were well aware about the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Although the death penalty is irreversible, life imprisonment allows for your possibility of reconsideration or commutation in the sentence in certain circumstances.